Next: About this document
Up: Dynamic and Stochastic Protein
Previous: Antibody Hypervariable Loops
An effective loop-modeling procedure has been developed which uses
probability grid Monte Carlo (PGMC) to search the conformational space
of the loop backbone and its sidechains. Although this method is
completely general, applicable to any loop conformation and sequence,
it produces results comparable to methods requiring database matching
or canonical structure matching. Modeling of the hypervariable loops
of the immunoglobulins HyHEL-5 and McPC603 showed that most loops can
be modeled to within 2 Å (backbone) or 3 Å (all-atom) rms
deviations from the crystal structures. Additional energy terms using
solvent-accessible surfaces or other solvation terms, may provide a
means for improving the correlation between energy and rms fit to the
crystal structure, thereby enabling backbone conformations to be
regularly fit to near 1 Å or better. In addition, concurrent
optimization of the sidechains of all six loops during Phase 2 should
improve the packing of sidechains and the prediction of the shape of
the antigen-binding site.
References
- 101
- I.T. Weber et al., Science, 243, 928-931 (1989).
- 102
- R.S. Struthers, D.H. Kitson, and A.T. Hagler, Proteins: Structure, Function, Genet.,
9, 1-11 (1991).
- 103
- J.F. Leszczynski and G.D. Rose, Science,
234, 849-855 (1986).
- 104
- C. Chothia and A.M. Lesk, J. Mol. Biol., 196, 901-917 (1987).
- 105
- T.A. Jones and S. Thirup, EMBO J., 5, 819-822
(1986).
- 106
- R.E. Bruccoleri and M. Karplus, Biopolymers, 26,
137-168 (1987).
- 107
- P.S. Shenkin et al., Biopolymers, 26, 2053-2085
(1987).
- 108
- A.C.R. Martin, J.C. Cheetham, and A.R. Rees,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 86, 9268-9272 (1989).
- 109
- S.L. Mayo, B.D. Olafson, and W.A. Goddard III,
J. Phys. Chem., 94, 8897-8909 (1990).
- 110
- BIOGRAF/POLYGRAF. Copyright by Molecular
Simulations, Inc. (1992).
- 111
- N. Go and H.A. Scheraga, Macromolecules, 3, 178-187 (1970).
- 112
- N. Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth,
and A.H. Teller, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087-1092 (1953).
- 113
- D. Eisenberg and A.D. McLachlan, Nature,
319, 199-203 (1986).
- 114
- Y. Satow et al., J. Mol. Biol., 190, 593-604
(1986).
- 115
- S. Sheriff et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 84, 8075-8079 (1987).
- 116
- C. Chothia et al., Nature, 342, 887-883 (1989).
- 117
- R.M. Fine et al., Proteins: Structure, Function, Genet., 1, 342-362 (1986).
- 118
- R.E. Bruccoleri, E. Haber, and J. Novotný,
Nature, 335, 564-568 (1988).
- 119
- D.R. Davies, E.A. Padlan, and S. Sheriff, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 59, 439-473, (1990).
- 120
- E.A. Padlan, G.H. Cohen, and D.R. Davies, Ann.
Inst. Pasteur/Immunol., 136C, 259-294 (1985).